Professional Candidate Assessment
The resources in this section focus on assessing professional candidates' performance.
The various documents include descriptions of assessment procedures and routines as well as
discussions of the various issues surrounding this aspect of personnel preparation. We categorize
these resources in the following way: (a) standards-based assessment systems; (b) high stakes exams; and
(c) a specific focus on the challenges of measuring dispositions.
(Links open in their own window. Close the window to return to this page.)
Assessment Guide for English Language Learners.
A 94 page document from The National Council of La Raza,produced under a grant from the
Annie E. Casey Foundation, 2005
http://www.monarchcenter.org/pdfs/assessment_guide.pdf
Assessing Teacher Education: The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing
program outcomes (2006)
This article describes a set of research and assessment strategies used to evaluate program
outcomes in the Stanford Teacher Education Program during a period of program redesign over the
past 5 years. These include perceptual data on what candidates feel they have learned in the program
(through surveys and interviews) as well as independent measures of what they have learned
(data from pretests and posttests, performance assessments, work samples, employers’ surveys,
and observations of practice). The article discusses the possibilities and limits of different
tools for evaluating teachers and teacher education and describes future plans for assessing
beginning teachers’ performance in teacher education, their practices in the initial years of
teaching, and their pupils’ learning.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Assessing teacher education: The usefulness of multiple measures for assessing program outcomes.
Journal of Teacher Education, 57(2), 120138.
Assessing Teacher Candidate Growth over Time: Embedded Signature Assessments (2005)
In 1998, California state legislation called for significant reform in the preparation of teachers.
As a result, institutions of higher learning must now conduct a formal performance-based assessment.
All teacher candidates must participate in the assessment at the end of the program for receipt of
the preliminary teaching credential. The California Commission on Teacher Credentialing (CCTC)
contracted with Educational Testing Service to develop a performance assessment that institutions
could adopt in response to the requirement. The legislation also allowed institutions to develop
alternative assessment designs, although they had to adhere to required standards and were subject
to a formal review. However, there currently is a moratorium on performance assessments until state
funding is secured to pay for the program.
The Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT) consortium emerged in fall 2001 with a
decision by deans and directors of teacher-education programs in the University of California (UC)
system to explore the creation of an alternative proposal. UC campuses (Berkeley, Davis, Irvine,
Los Angeles, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara, and Santa Cruz), along with several other public
universities (California State University at Sacramento, San Diego State University, San Jose State
University) and private institutions (Stanford University, University of Southern California,
and Mills College), produced a teacher performance portfolio with the distinctive feature discussed
in this article—the embedded signature assessment (ESA).
Larsen, L.R., & Calfee, R.C. (2005). Assessing teacher candidate growth over time:
Embedded signature assessments. The Clearing House, 78(4), 151-157.
Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the Classification of Children With Disabilities: Part I
This article synthesizes 6 papers that address broad questions relating to disability classification
and categorization, cross-national comparisons on disability in education, the World Health Organization’s
International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), and Amartya
Sen’s capability approach. The focus of the article is the intentions, purposes, and future directions for
disability classification in education. The authors argue that these advances offer researchers and policymakers
the opportunity to examine the relational nature of disability classification in any recalibration
of statutory standards or educational policy reforms. Such developments are necessary to move beyond
discrete categorical classification systems traditionally used in education that (a) do not recognize
the complexity of human differences, (b) unnecessarily stigmatize children, and (c) do not always benefit
the individuals who are classified.
http://www.monarchcenter.org/pdfs/Florian_2006.pdf
Cross-Cultural Perspectives on the Classification of Children With Disabilities: Part II
This article is the second in a 2-part synthesis of an international comparative seminar on the
classification of children with disabilities. In this article, the authors discuss classification
frameworks used in identifying children for the purpose of providing special education and related
services. The authors summarize 7 papers that addressed aspects of disability classification in educational systems in the
United States and the United Kingdom. They discuss current policies for determining which children
receive special education services, the origins and evolution of these policies, and current dilemmas
and challenges associated with classification schemes and the provision of special education.
The authors also describe emerging data and possible models and practices that might be used in educational
systems. They conclude with the recognition that both formal and informal educational classification
systems will continue to be required within a system that must address the competing priorities of
individual needs and the broader social and community goals of education. However, as was argued in
the previous article, by understanding the mix of intentions that underpin these policies, as well
as periodically reviewing the norms that underlie them, it may be possible to move classification
to descriptors that can be used to efficiently and effectively define educational needs and distribute resources.
http://www.monarchcenter.org/pdfs/McLaughlin_2006.pdf
Data-Driven Assessment of Teacher Candidates During their Internships in Deaf Education (2004)
In response to criticism deaf education teacher training programs have received for graduating
students with gaps in knowledge and skills required for specific placements, the present study,
an ecobehavioral assessment computer program, MS- CISSAR (Mainstream Code for Instructional Structure
and Student Academic Response), was used in evaluations of 8 teacher candidates during internship
experiences. Results were mixed. Some of the instructional arrangements, teaching behaviors, and
student responses resembled those found in studies using in-service teachers as subjects; however,
some data revealed a need for changes in instruction. Data gathered with MS-CISSAR could be added to
evaluations to help training programs meet NCATE requirements for evidence on teacher candidate
performance and candidates’ effect on student learning.
Roberson, L., Woolsey, M.L., Seabrooks, J., & Williams, G. (2004). Data-driven assessment of
teacher candidates during their internships in deaf education.
American Annals of the Deaf, 148(5), 403-412.
In search of the essence of a good teacher: towards a more holistic approach in teacher
education (2004)
There are two central questions determining the pedagogy of teacher education: (1) What are the
essential qualities of a good teacher, and (2) How can we help people to become good teachers?
Korthagen’s objective is not to present a definitive answer to these questions, but to discuss
an umbrella model of levels of change that could serve as a framework for reflection and development.
The model highlights relatively new areas of research, viz. teachers’ professional identity and
mission. Appropriate teacher education interventions at the different levels of change are discussed,
as well as implications for new directions in teacher education.
Korthagen, F.A.J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: towards a more holistic
approach in teacher education.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 77-97.
National Center for Fair and Open Testing Website.
An advocacy organization working to end abuses, misuses, and flaws of standardized testing and ensure that evaluation of
students and workers is fair, open, and educationally sound. Special emphasis is placed on eliminating racial, class, gender and
cultural barriers to equal opportunity of education. Position statements and fact sheets are available.
http://www.fairtest.org
Performance Assessment and Electronic Portfolios: Their Effect on Teacher Learning and
Education (2005).
This article explores the learning opportunities that standards-based portfolio assessment
offers to promote teacher and faculty learning in teacher education. The authors discuss the
impact on learning from two perspectives: that of teacher candidates and faculty using a paper-and
-pencil approach for portfolio development, mentoring, and scoring; and from that of teacher
candidates and faculty who used an electronic platform (UCOPIS) for portfolio development,
mentoring, and scoring.
Pecheone, R.L., Pigg, M.J., Chung, R.R., & Souviney, R.J. (2005). Performance assessment and
electronic portfolios: Their effect on teacher learning and education.
The Clearing House, 78(4), 164-176.
Requirements for an Assessment Procedure for Beginning Teachers: Implications for Recent Theories on Teaching and Assessment.
Uhlenbeck, Anne Marie, Verloop, Nico, & Beijaard, Douwe. (2002). Teachers College Record, 104(2).
Report of a study to determine the best approaches to the development of procedures to assess beginning teachers.
Studies on teacher thinking, development, learning, and knowledge were reviewed, and studies on new approaches to
teacher assessment were examined. Analyses of these topics led to a proposed framework consisting of 15 implications
for the development of beginning teacher assessments. Full text and executive summary. Full text.
http://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentID=10828
WestEd (the Assessment Specialty Regional Educational Laboratory).
Assessment and Standards Development Services.
Among other things, WestEd is involved in teacher assessment projects that are making use of new methodologies to
document teacher knowledge and skill. These include projects targeting specific teacher groups (for example, certifying
teachers to teach English language learners; helping beginning teachers improve their skills). Project samples are
available at the web site.
http://www.wested.org/asds/
Return to top
|